Trump fails the Hiroshima test: Nicholas Burns

When Barack Obama makes the first ever visit by an American president to Hiroshima this week, it will be a sobering reminder of the extraordinary power that comes with his office.

Since the day 71 years ago this August when President Harry Truman ordered the use of an atomic weapon to destroy the Japanese city during World War II, his successors in the White House have been custodians of the most powerful and destructive arsenal in human history. How fortunate we are that all of them, without exception, have shouldered stewardship of America’s nuclear weapons judiciously, wisely and in accordance with our most important values.

This is one reason why the presidential election this fall is so important and why Donald Trump’s candidacy is so troubling and potentially dangerous. It was Trump, after all, who in an early Republican debate appeared to lack even the most rudimentary knowledge of the U.S. nuclear triad — our capacity to launch nuclear weapons from aircraft, ground units and submarines.

Each American president must bring to the office a deep respect for these weapons that he or she alone may order to be deployed. And all of them must value the importance of restraint when dealing with history’s most destructive technology. In this sense, our presidents must also meet the most difficult test of modern diplomacy — how to contain and ultimately defeat our adversaries without unleashing a catastrophic war in the process. Trump has shown no such knowledge, sophistication or skill in his helter-skelter campaign this spring.

Obama’s visit to Japan also takes place against the backdrop of Trump’s accusation that the governments of Japan and South Korea, both vital military allies of the U.S., have failed to contribute adequate financial support for the stationing of American military forces in their countries. As is so often the case, Trump is wrong on the facts. But that has not stopped him from threatening to withdraw U.S. military and nuclear protection of Tokyo and Seoul, disband our alliance with them and even suggesting they develop their own nuclear weapons in an already brittle and unstable Asia.

Cheer up GOP, maybe Trump is the next Truman: Column

Trump’s recommendation would repudiate 70 years of American policy supported by every Republican and Democratic President. It would cause America’s many friends and allies to question Washington’s credibility and seriousness. And it might lead to a Beijing-Tokyo arms race that could destabilize the region and weaken American influence in the process. Words matter in foreign policy. Trump’s are ill-considered and incendiary.

The late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan might have been describing Trump when he remarked famously that “You are entitled to your opinion.  But you are not entitled to your own facts.” Here are the facts about Japan which Trump disregards. It is one of America’s most important and loyal allies in the world. The U.S.-Japan military alliance is central to our long-term strategic aim to limit China’s military reach in Asia and to maintain the U.S. as the region’s predominant power. And the Japanese have provided billions of dollars per year to support American forces on Okinawa and on other bases in the country.

Trump’s repeated verbal assaults on Japan, South Korea and our NATO allies raise another concern about his candidacy. He is consistently tougher on our friends than on our autocratic adversaries such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, of whom he has spoken admiringly.

Trump's nuclear views are terrifying: Column

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

This calls into question his basic fitness for the Oval Office. Our Canadian, European and Asian alliances are America’s most important strategic advantage over Russia and China. Our allies strengthen us. They expand and magnify our power in the world. They have our back in countless crises, including Afghanistan today. Moscow and Beijing have no equivalent alliance system. Why would Trump risk relinquishing such indisputable American assets in a dangerous 21st century?

As Obama stands with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Hiroshima’s Peace Memorial Park this week, it will be a reminder of what we need from our presidents in the nuclear age — judgment, experience, maturity and sophistication. Hillary Clinton more than meets that test. Donald Trump fails it in his character and in his reckless proposals that would weaken American leadership in the world today.

Is there a more important issue for the November election and for the future of our country?

Nicholas Burnsis a Harvard professor and former under secretary of State who served presidents of both parties in his Foreign Service career.  Currently a visiting fellow at Stanford, he is an adviser to Hillary Clinton's campaign.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns, go to the Opinion front page and follow us on Twitter @USATOpinion.