Skip to main content

Strategic Cause Marketing, Post No. 434

Strategic cause marketing like strategic philanthropy is one of those things to strive for. And as a blogger it's a topic that is all but evergreen.

Strategic cause marketing means there’s a logical connection between the cause and the company. So, a logical charity for a hair salon to support is Locks of Love, which makes wigs for people who have lost their hair due to a medical condition. A logical charity for children’s book publisher is a children’s literacy cause. A restaurant chain might choose a hunger charity, etc.

But certainly not all cause marketing is strategic. Nor should it be. Imagine how limited a cause with great affinity like UNICEF would be if they limited their sights to only those companies that sell to children in the developing world.

In the last few days I’ve come across two splendid examples of strategic cause marketing and strategic philanthropy.

The first is from a pair of cheeky product designers who run an online retail outlet called ‘the.’ The second from E.B. White’s classic kiddie lit The Trumpet of the Swan.

Among other things, ‘the’ sells plastic lunch bags printed to look like green mold is growing on whatever’s inside, thereby foiling would-be office sandwich thieves and lunchtime bullies at school. When you buy “Anti-Theft Lunch Bags  ‘the’ will donate 5% of the purchase price to Freedom from Hunger, a 60-year old microfinance charity with operations in 16 countries in the developing world.

It’s perfectly strategic cause marketing. Sandwich bags paired with a hunger charity in the sassiest strategic cause marketing I can recall from a company whose name is a definite article. Bravo, the.

My second example requires a little bit of setup and (spoiler alert) I’m going to reveal the plotline of E.B. White’s wonderful book, The Trumpet of the Swan.

The book concerns a trumpeter swan named Louis who is born unable to make a sound. In a desperate attempt to give his son a voice, Louis’ father crashes into a music store in Billings, Montana and steals a trumpet. Louis, a bright cygnet if ever there was one, learns the trumpet, as well as how to read and write.

His adventures as a trumpet playing swan culminate in Philadelphia where he earns $500 a week playing in a seedy jazz club. He returns home to Montana with a wad of cash, which he gives to his father so he can reclaim his dignity by repaying his debt to the music store.

The father returns to the store with the money and a note from Louis. As he descends from the sky, the music store owner… worried he’s going to be robbed again… fires his shotgun. Louis’ father is grazed, but not hurt by a single shotgun pellet, and manages to land. All of which creates quite a stir on the streets of Billings and attracts a crowd that includes a game warden, a policeman, a judge and other men, women and children.

Because the money Louis made performing is many times more than the cost for the trumpet and the store’s repair, the storekeeper is left with a dilemma. What should he do with the extra money that literally fell from the sky?

The storekeeper says:

“I have an announcement… I am only going to keep just enough money to pay for the stolen trumpet and the repair bills for my store. All the rest of the money will be given to a good cause if I can think of just the right one. Can anyone think of a worthy cause that needs money?”

The Salvation Army,” suggested woman.

“No.” said the storekeeper.

“The Boy Scouts?” suggested a boy

“No,” said the storekeeper.

“The American Civil Liberties Union?” suggested a man.

“Nope,” said the storekeeper. Nobody has thought of just the right place for me to send this money.”

“How about the Audubon Society?” asked a little fellow whose nose looked like the beak of a bird.

“Great! You’ve got it!” cried the storekeeper. “A bird has been very good to me, and now I want to do something for birds. The Audubon Society is kind to birds. I want this money to be used to help birds. Some birds are in real trouble. They face extinction.”

That, my friends, is strategic philanthropy. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
I don't quite understand what you are saying in the end. I know it's different in that the swan has nothing to do with the store owners direct business, but then what do you call it? Swan Cause Marketing?
Paul Jones said…
Hi James:

Sorry for the confusion.

In this post I was talking about both strategic cause marketing and strategic philanthropy.

In Trumpet of the Swan the storekeeper practiced strategic philanthropy (giving) in a one time action that was appropriate to the moment (ie. a crowd scene where both the cop and the game warden were trying to get hold of some of the money). The Judge in the crowd had summarily awarded all the money to the storekeeper. And wanting to keep the goodwill of the crowd, the storekeeper determined to give away the extra money to a cause that made sense at that moment.

Given that context, the Audubon Society made perfect strategic sense.

I should have included all that in the post.

Thanks for the comment.

Warm regards,
Paul Jones

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor